Question
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be equally likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as the current one.
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
Option E
(This question is from Official Guide. Therefore, because of copyrights, the complete question cannot be copied here. The question can be accessed at GMAT Club)
Solution
Sentence Analysis
The sentence presents a prediction of traffic safety officials. The prediction is that the chances that drivers will exceed the proposed speed limit is equal to the chances that they exceed the current speed limit.
The problem with the sentence is the use of non-idiomatic structure “equally…as”. The correct idiom is “as…as”.
Option Analysis
(A) Incorrect. For the error mentioned above.
(B) Incorrect. Same error as in the original sentence.
(C) Incorrect. Same error as in the original sentence. Also, the structure “X is likely that X will do” is incorrect. The correct structure is “X is likely to do…”.
(D) Incorrect. The structure “X is likely that X will do” is incorrect. The correct structure is “X is likely to do…”.
(E) Correct. This option uses the correct idiom “as…as”. Many people find this option incorrect because of the structure at the end “they are the current one”. This structure uses ellipsis; the words “likely to exceed” are elided. Without the ellipsis, the structure will read “as they are likely to exceed the current one”. Now, it makes perfect sense. Right?
So, you have to see if the structure uses ellipsis, and then see if the structure will make sense by inserting a few words from the previous part of the comparison.
Also, it’s important to understand that in the original sentence, even the subject and verb were elided after “as” (The original sentence has “as the current one”). However, given that the verbs (“will be” and “are”) are different in the two parts of the comparison, it is strongly preferable to mention the verb in the second part instead of eliding it.
Related
Discover more from GMAT with CJ
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Hi CJ,
Can we not negate D because it compares a clause with a noun phrase. Meaning that for proper comparison using as, we need to have to compare two clauses.
Okay. Do you consider the following sentence correct?
Indians are as likely to follow the speed limits as Americans.
Is it correct?
Yes.
Sir,
Thanks for your earlier answer to a different thread.
Is it right to say
Drivers are as likely to exceed proposed speed limit1 [eg. 50 kmph] as speedlimit2[eg. 100 kmph].
OR
Drivers are as likely to exceed proposed speed limit1 as to exceed speedlimit2.
I am taking both actions happen at same time.
Parallelism entails that infinitives be parallel to infinitives yet ellipsis makes omission of words possible in the 2nd half.
If we skip “to exceed ” in the 2nd half proposed speed limit 2 becomes parallel to speed limit 1. I am not sure this is right/wrong.?
Do we repeat to exceed or not ?
Both constructions are correct.
Leave a comment